Sign In

Film Grain - CE

8.6k

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

stylefilmgrain

Download

1 variant available

SafeTensor

82.06 MB

Verified:

Type
LoRA
Stats

297

8

22

Reviews
Published

Apr 24, 2025

Base Model

Flux.1 D

Usage Tips
Strength: 0.5
Hash
AutoV2
ABDFC70E9E
Trigger Words
flmgrnCE_style
default creator card background decoration
Reactions - 172186

172.2K

Likes - 17951

18K

Downloads - 207642

207.6K

Vidu Contest Participant

The FLUX.1 [dev] Model is licensed by Black Forest Labs. Inc. under the FLUX.1 [dev] Non-Commercial License. Copyright Black Forest Labs. Inc.

IN NO EVENT SHALL BLACK FOREST LABS, INC. BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH USE OF THIS MODEL.

2025-04-24 154132_00001_.png

Not exactly film grain, but it can apply an interesting grainy effect to your images. Give it a try and see what you think.

V04

This is my final attempt to produce a LoRA that approximates a film grain effect. Realistic analog film grain produces features that are difficult to reproduce digitally. I spent a lot of time producing new training images and then running the output through ChatGPT to determine the best prompt to help produce a realistic film grain result. Results vary across models. Some models produce better results. Take a look for yourself.

Each of the prompts includes the following lines (more or less):

35mm Kodak Portra 400 pushed one stop, fine natural grain, soft highlight roll-off, neutral skin tones. Slight shadow grain clumping. Indoor tungsten lighting, visible film grain.
A monochrome image.
A bright grainy photo, overexposed. With an artistically pronounced film grain effect in varying intensity across the image. Natural lighting.

Note the parts: neutral skin tones and indoor tungsten lighting

Exclude these as appropriate, depending on your subject and setting. ChatGPT suggested all of this, and it seemed to produce a better result. Maybe you can come up with something better? I still think that, at times, the result is a little flat and smooth.

Let's see your results.