TCD workflow for compare : TCD / HYPERSD/ LCM / LIGHTING | Fast SDXL generation

Hi! I'm not an expert in workflows, but when I see the speed and quality that these Loras can achieve, I want to compare them with the TCD scheduler. Maybe it's a mess, but perhaps this will inspire or work for someone.

Notes:

• To make this work, you'll need the loras with the number of steps you want to test:

TCD Loras: TCD LORAS: h1t/TCD-SDXL-LoRA at main (huggingface.co)

HyperSD Loras: HYPERSD LORAS: ByteDance/Hyper-SD at main (huggingface.co)

Lighting Loras: ByteDance/SDXL-Lightning at main (huggingface.co)

LCM Loras: latent-consistency/lcm-lora-sdxl at main (huggingface.co)

• For the nodes, use the Comfyui Manager and "install missing custom nodes".

• You can play with the strength of the Loras and the sigma (sigma 1 for less details, sigma 0 for a burned image. I think 0.3-0.6 is good).

Conclusion

In my test, I think TCD and "1step Hypersd" Lora were the best. For the "1step Hypersd" Lora, I used 5 or 8 steps. With one step, I only get a single color image.