Sign In

Babes Reviews

I've got a weird issue. The image looks great, and then all of a sudden it will look washed out and over saturated at the last second. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong... Anyone have any ideas?

Thank you for this amazing model. I am still not sure how to build my own prompt with this model, but it is fun enough to use the exmples with ControlNet. This model works fairly well with ControlNet open pose

Look gents, I'm not gonna beat around the bush here... I'm in this 'Staple Confusion' thing because it lets me make pictures of hot chicks. If by some remote chance you happen to share the same goal, the "Babes" model delivers!

Even just a few prompt terms will result in some of the *******est female forms you have ever seen, but note that prompt sensitivity is fairly low, so if you have specific ideas, getting what you want can be challenging. Be prepared to use ControlNet, multiple img2img iterations, and plenty of inpainting to achieve that perfect look.

Faces by default are vapid bimbo types or standard anime faces, as you might expect. To get something other than the Stepford Wives with silicone lips, I recommend adding emotional markers like "angry" to the prompt. This will not necessarily result in an angry expression, but will often make the face much more interesting. Unfortunately, it can also introduce artifacts like a prominent Adam's apple, and no amount of negprompting can eliminate those entirely in my experience, so inpainting is your friend.

With appropriate negprompts, the hands drawn by this model are acceptable about 70-80% of the time, which is far better than most other models. I've also found "Babes" to work well with many LoRAs, even those trained from different base checkpoints.

Overall, a model that spits out attractive women by the hundreds with very little effort required from the user. Kudos to the author, I can't wait to see how "Babes" will develop in the future.

[deleted]